Olbermann's Worst Person: Dunkin' Donuts

published by Tofumar

3 months 1 week ago • 2575 views

tags: Keith Olbermann, Michelle Malkin, Dunkin Donuts, Scarf, Rachel Ray

bookmarks (0)

You should also watch
“Olbermann: Michelle Malkin - Worse Person Award”

Terrorist scarves attack! And Rachel Ray is their accomplice.

Comments

*waronterror
*fear

written by NetRunner

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Adding video to channels (Fear, Waronterror) - requested by NetRunner.

written by siftbot

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

So is Dunkin Donuts run by right wing nut jobs, or just regular retarded? I already don't buy domino's pizza cause their founder is a religious zealot. An easy decision since I don't really care for them among the delivery pizzas franchise. Not purchasing Dunkin Donuts would be easy as well since there probably isn't one within 100 miles of me, but I do like their product.

Of course, I realize all that is futile and I'm sure most big franchises are probably headed by neocons, but hey I can at least feel some amount of pleasure by not supporting the ones with an outward FOX news like apperance.

written by Crosswords

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 5 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Keith Olbermann, Michelle Malkin, Dunkin Donuts, Scarf' to 'Keith Olbermann, Michelle Malkin, Dunkin Donuts, Scarf, Rachel Ray' - edited by kronosposeidon

written by siftbot

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Remember what the fundamentalist zealot-in-chief said after 9/11: If we stop shopping, the terrorists win.

My feeling is, if shopping is what defines our "freedom," they've already won.

And I for one welcome our jihadist Islamic overlords because, from the looks of it, they'll be a significant improvement over the neocon absurdity that's passed for "leadership" over the past seven-and-a-half years.

written by Trancecoach

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Scarves are the apparel of appeasers. How does a scarf mean appeasement? Because appeasers wear scarves. Why do appeasers wear scarves? Because they believe in appeasement. So what's wrong with that scarf? Because she's an appeasing appeaser promoting appeasement by appeasingly wearing an appeasive scarf. And peddling donuts. APPEASEMENT donuts!

written by kronosposeidon

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

★▲ 22 ▼ | flag spam (0)

^Krono, if your current job doesn't work out I think you've got the talent to be a talking head on FOX. Sure you'll have to sell your soul, but think of the money.

written by Crosswords

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 5 ▼ | flag spam (0)

"...she's an appeasing appeaser promoting appeasement by wearing an appeaser scarf. And peddling donuts. APPEASEMENT donuts!"

Yes, she's already given the holes away to the enemy in a vain attempt to stave off their lust for blood.

written by Tofumar

| 3 months 1 week ago | CH

▲ 9 ▼ | flag spam (0)

*promote (vote count - 38)

written by kronosposeidon

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Saturday, May 31st, 2008 1:47am PDT - promote requested by kronosposeidon.

written by siftbot

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Don't tell my wife, but I become gayer for Olbermann every time I hear one of his rants.

written by Xax | 3 months ago | CH

▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)

That is soooo pathetic and sad. It seems nothing can be said or done without potentially offending someone.

Oh, Shiek is also pronounced, "shake".

Damn. Now I'm craving donuts. Why is that?

written by SSIops | 3 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

This guy is epic win!

written by NordlichReiter

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0)

>> ^SSIops:
That is soooo pathetic and sad. It seems nothing can be said or done without potentially offending someone.

Oh, Shiek is also pronounced, "shake".

Damn. Now I'm craving donuts. Why is that?

He said chic, not sheikh.

written by jwray

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 6 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I have no problem boycotting Dunkin Donuts, since there aren't in where I live, but I'd love to put on a scarf and go into one.

written by jimnms

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 4 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Exactly KO, exactly. You have stated what so many of us have thought, it's not so much the right wing nutjobs who are at fault here, they're entitled to be nutjobs and spout their crazy talk, but it is up to everyone else to pat them on the head, smile sagely and then completely ignore them, NOT REACT TO THEM.

It is insane, completely insane and seeing as I haven't had a DD anything for a good couple of years, hell I'll jump on the bandwagon and say I'm boycotting them too

They can join Dominos who I already was for reasons given above, but that was easy because they are the WORST pizzas I've ever come across, I don't know how they became so popular.

And they join Gloria Jeans here in Australia, because their owners give thousands of dollars to the 'Mercy Ministries' who 'help' women in trouble (by telling them they're possessed mostly, or that their interest in Dungeons and Dragons has led them down their path to dispear... I kid you not, check out the application form and the tick boxes here) but then that wasn't hard either because I don't like their coffee either.

Man, what can I boycott that I actually enjoy?

written by spoco2

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I have never paid for Dunkin Donuts anyway. It's unhealthy crap.

written by jwray

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

>> ^Crosswords:
I already don't buy domino's pizza cause their founder is a religious zealot.

During my trips to the US I've twice purchased their pizza only because Tom Monaghan because is, as you charmingly describe him as, a "religious zealot."

I'm sorry, but when did being a devout Catholic equate with being a religious zealot?

He's helped build infrastructure in poor villages and established organizations to promote the Catholic faith.

Were another man to use his wealth and fortune to promote humanistic causes and atheist communities or whatever the equivalent is be called an atheistic zealot?

He's putting his money where his mouth/faith is. I don't see why you should be upset by this, unless there's some NOW propaganda I'm unfamiliar with. I see unverified claims and rumours but nothing concrete. I'm not impressed by the hate against Tom.

written by Krupo

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 1 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Dunkin' Donuts: haven from hippies and illegals. Shit, gimme two.

written by quantumushroom

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ -3 ▼ | flag spam (0)

I call wanting to create a town where you control all the content on the Zealot level of religion. For the record I also happen to think creating an atheist only town, where everything is controlled to reflect atheist values (whatever those maybe) equally insane.

But perhaps its the Thomas More Law Center, which under the guise of religious freedom has pushed to indoctrinate religious values into the government even more than they already are. To this end they have used litigation to push anti-gay agendas, intelligent design, pro-life, and even anti-sex education. So that's why all the Tom 'hate'. I'm not going to buy a product from someone who has founded a legal team dedicated to imposing religious values on a secular nation.

written by Crosswords

| 3 months ago | CH

▲ 6 ▼ | flag spam (0)

Reminds me of the McCarthy witch hunts. Is Rachel blacklisted now?

written by EnemyCombatant