|
| |
|
spoco2 ![]() Member Profile Member Since: 2006-08-21 Last Power Points used: 2009-09-22 • Available: now Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now Comments |
Subscribe Navigation
Member Stats Rank: 142 Rating:
144 star points#1 Videos: 2 Top 15 Videos: 13 Votes Received: 3668 Average Votes Per Video: 32.75 Votes Cast: 1654 Comments Posted: 3106 • browse Comments Applauded: 68 Sifted Videos: 112 Sift Talk Posts: 16 Quality Sift Talk Posts: 2 Dead Pool Fixes: 30 Profile Views: 22134 Highest Ranked Comments |
Thank you very much for your support against the attack from dystopian. He has done this before on the issue of racism.
He's made a second comment which was a massive attempt at an insulting psycho-analysis to try and a) insult and antagonise me and b) discredit me to others as a racist.
I absolutely will not stoop to doing that to him, nor giving him a fake psycho analysis to try and illustrate his deep rooted character faults.
It really upsets me that there are people on the sift that would do that kind of thing. Disagreeing with me is fine, but trying to publically analyse me and give a heavily biased insulting rundown is really .. well, i have no words for it, i'm simply hurt.
Seeing that someone understood and can see what dyst was trying to do makes me feel a WHOLE lot better
LOL. Hey, not fair, I want a toady too.
Also... http://www.videosift.com/video/67-year-old-white-dude-told-him-not-to-fuck-with-him?loadcomm=1#comment-947099
In reply to this comment by spoco2:
Sometimes you wonder if there are people who are just completely unable to comprehend that some of us can watch something like that and not think about the race of the two people but rather the actions of them.
In reply to this comment by dannym3141:
Thank you very much for your support against the attack from dystopian. He has done this before on the issue of racism.
He's made a second comment which was a massive attempt at an insulting psycho-analysis to try and a) insult and antagonise me and b) discredit me to others as a racist.
I absolutely will not stoop to doing that to him, nor giving him a fake psycho analysis to try and illustrate his deep rooted character faults.
It really upsets me that there are people on the sift that would do that kind of thing. Disagreeing with me is fine, but trying to publically analyse me and give a heavily biased insulting rundown is really .. well, i have no words for it, i'm simply hurt.
Seeing that someone understood and can see what dyst was trying to do makes me feel a WHOLE lot better
He's made a second comment which was a massive attempt at an insulting psycho-analysis to try and a) insult and antagonise me and b) discredit me to others as a racist.
I absolutely will not stoop to doing that to him, nor giving him a fake psycho analysis to try and illustrate his deep rooted character faults.
It really upsets me that there are people on the sift that would do that kind of thing. Disagreeing with me is fine, but trying to publically analyse me and give a heavily biased insulting rundown is really .. well, i have no words for it, i'm simply hurt.
Seeing that someone understood and can see what dyst was trying to do makes me feel a WHOLE lot better
In reply to this comment by spoco2:
I'll happily call dupeof... once the embed is changed, bugger having to watch a 30 second video before it starts, AND it being in crap quality
In reply to this comment by spoco2:
>> ^marinara:
I've liked other bits by neely, but this is about a real person in my life and is particularly painful to watch. don't bother to post more like this.
Are you actually being serious? Because that's a bit sad... Not that you believe that jesus is a real person in your life, but that you feel that you can say "don't bother to post more like this."
How about you just not watch them, or if you do, then fine, vote against them, but to actually think that you speak for the sift and that they shouldn't post more like this... really... that's pretty damn screwed up.
If you have a belief that Jesus is real (which really, try and find anything to suggest he really was, there is NOTHING contemporary written about him, NOTHING), then that should be a strong enough belief that humour about him doesn't get you riled up and in a mood to censor people.
In reply to this comment by spoco2:
Oh fine... *quality then.
In reply to this comment by spoco2:
Argh, there's a spammer spamming my profile and posts, how does one ban someone? I thought we just did a * ban on their profile?
http://www.videosift.com/member/aikowest0002
In reply to this comment by spoco2:
Downvote this:
A) GOD DAMN AWFUL video... shut the hell up, as others have said, WE CAN READ.
B) It's obviously a bug if you just take your damn tin foil hat off for a second
There's something about ISlam starting with IS and following it with an is... that's my take without actually reading their statement of bug.
If you write "islam hate" then you get 'Islam haters, Islam hates women, Islam hates America, Islam hates Jews, Islam hateful religion, Islam hates Christianity etc. etc.'
Really? So you think they did a stupid filter for something and yet left off many others?
Idiots... There are reactionary dickheads on both sides of the religious debate, that's for damn sure.