Top New Discussions
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |
|
| Top Sift for Nov 20th, 2009Friends O' the Sift  Subscribe Top 15 80s Sifters of All Time Top 11 80s Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments        |
Sifted 80s Videos
Bryce, Brycewi19 got his ruby - baby (Happy Talk Post)
Sarah Palin Fans: Not That Bright
In other news, the Rocky Mountains are pretty rocky.
China is mostly populated by Asians.
Fox news: Not really very fair or balanced.
Couple Arrested for Not Paying Tip
BRING ON THE NAZI COMPARISONS!
Bryce, Brycewi19 got his ruby - baby (Happy Talk Post)
Congrats bryce!
Jimmy Carr: Audience doesn't "get it" on The Late Late Show
Couple Arrested for Not Paying Tip
Bryce, Brycewi19 got his ruby - baby (Happy Talk Post)
Congrats!
Couple Arrested for Not Paying Tip
Bryce, Brycewi19 got his ruby - baby (Happy Talk Post)
Congrats dude. Any channel ideas?
Jimmy Carr: Audience doesn't "get it" on The Late Late Show
"An internal server error occurred. Please try again later." (Sift Talk Post)
until next time.
Mobile VideoSift Now Available on Droids and iPhones (Sift Talk Post)
Sarah Palin Fans: Not That Bright
Couple Arrested for Not Paying Tip
Reading Blankfist's posts, it appears he's arguing that in this specific case the restaurant was in the right. Seeing as how the extra charge was clearly made known to these customers well before they ordered their meal, I'm 100% in agreement that they're liable to pay their bill, regardless of the service they received.
However, what Gwiz seemed to be arguing is the theoretical scenario in which a restaurant adds a charge without telling the customer beforehand, effectively tricking the customer into a situation where they have to pay more than was advertised and therefore not giving the customer the chance to take their business elsewhere. If I got that right I'm in 100% agreement with Gwiz aswell.
The key word here is communication. A restaurant has the right to add whatever charge it likes, aswell as raise their prices as much as they like. I've no problem with paying an extra 18%, so long as the restaurant has made it clear that this is their practice. This can be done with a note in their menu, a few words from a staff member or whatever. Knowing that there is an extra 18% charge on top of the total price gives the customer the opportunity to decide whether or not to eat there. But getting a table, ordering the food, eating it and getting the bill before finding out this extra expenditure is not acceptable business practice in my opinion.
Gameheadz: A Video Game History TV Documentary